Understanding the place of humans in the global food chain

As concern increases about the ability of the earth to provide enough food for a growing human population it becomes increasingly important to better understand the feeding habits of humans. Recent research presents previously unknown information about our place in the global food chain.

Researchers in France have determined the Human Trophic Level and have found that, globally, humans are slowly moving to a diet which includes more meat, though this trend is not true in all countries. As the researchers explain, trophic levels describe the position of species in a food web, from primary producers to apex predators. They are regarded as critical for synthesizing species’ diets, depicting energy pathways, understanding food web dynamics and ecosystem functioning, and monitoring ecosystem health.

Among some of the interesting findings of the research:

  • humans currently appropriate 25% of the net primary production of the planet through food production and land use and this human appropriation is approaching the planetary boundary.
  • for a fixed quantity of food consumed, it is more efficient for human populations to eat from lower trophic levels (biomass rather than meat) to reduce the extraction of resources.
  • the global median human trophic level has increased by 3% since 1961. This trend is mainly driven by China and India and the human trophic level of the rest of the world is relatively stable.
  • there are large variations in diet between countries and over time.
  • in the global food web humans are similar to anchovy and pigs and cannot be considered apex (top of the food chain) predators.

There is considerable diversity in diet between the 176 countries of this study, but only five different groups of HTLs. The majority of sub-Saharan countries and most of Southeast Asia have a pattern of low and stable HTL, reflecting diets that are primarily plant based. Low and increasing HTLs are found for several countries throughout Asia, Africa, and South America, including China and India. Central America, Brazil, Chile, Southern Europe, several African countries, and Japan, have higher HTLs and also show an increasing trend. North America, Northern and Eastern Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, had high and stable HTLs until 1990, when they begin to decrease. Iceland, Scandinavia, Mongolia, and Mauritania, with traditional diets of meat, fish, or dairy products and low vegetable consumption, have the highest overall HTLs but these too are decreasing.

The research finds complex associations between HTL and the socioeconomic, environmental, and cultural characteristics of countries. Large-scale patterns show that HTL is positively related to, for example, gross domestic product, life expectancy, CO2 emissions, and urbanization rate, until a point after which the relationships plateau and then turn negative (declining consumption of meat).

The research paper is available, free abstract and small fee required for the full paper, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
at http://www.pnas.org/gca?allch=&submit=Go&gca=pnas%3B1305827110v1

American urban driving is down, according to study

A study by the U.S. Public Interest Research Group Education Fund and Frontier Group, a think tank claiming to produce ideas and research to promote a cleaner environment and a fairer and more democratic society, claims that from 2006 to 2011, the average number of miles driven per resident fell in almost three-quarters of America’s largest urbanized areas for which up-to-date and accurate data are available.

The numbers are small and the data, drawn from a range of public sources, are somewhat shaky but the overall and highly detailed analysis does suggest that a trend away from cars and towards public transportation and bicycles is underway. The report indicates that from 2004 to 2012, the average number of vehicle-miles driven per capita decreased by 7.6 percent and from 2007 – when Americans’ total vehicle travel peaked – to 2012, the total number of miles driven in America fell by 3.1 percent.

US PIRG reports that this trend has arisen because:

  • Americans are saturated with driving.
  • vehicle ownership per licensed driver has declined by 4 percent since 2006.
  • the percent of driving-age Americans holding licenses has declined. In 2011, 86 percent of driving age Americans held licenses, the lowest percentage in 30 years
  • Americans may be hitting the limit on the amount of time they are willing to spend in their cars each day.
  • workers tend to drive more miles than non-workers and the share of Americans in the labor force has dropped from its 2000 peak of 67.3 percent to 63.2 percent – the lowest level since 1978.
  • with baby boomers retiring, a greater share of Americans are entering age groups that have historically driven fewer miles.
  • from 2002 to 2012, the average inflation-adjusted price of a gallon of gasoline doubled and put car ownership out of reach for many families.
  • Americans are increasingly choosing other modes of transportation – light rail, buses, trains, bicycles or walking – for trips they might once have taken by car,

If similar trends are applicable to Canada, medium to long-term consequences could include such trends as:

  • a natural end to urban sprawl.
  • preference for local shopping rather than big box stores located in suburban areas.
  • a greater need for delivery services.
  • a need to rethink parking requirements to reduce the number of vacant spaces.
  • increased government emphasis on public transportation rather than building of more roads.
  • employees moving closer to places of employment requiring a transition to greater integration of residential, commercial, industrial and institutional land uses rather than their segregation as so often occurs at present.
  • reduced requirement for petroleum fuels and fuel distribution locations.

The 36 page US PIRG report Transportation in Transition: A Look at Changing Travel Patterns in America’s Biggest Cities is available at http://uspirg.org/reports/usp/transportation-transition

A related 53 page report, commenting more on the implications of reduced automobile use, is entitled A New Direction: Our Changing Relationship with Driving and the Implications for America’s Future is available at http://www.uspirg.org/reports/usp/new-direction

New Ontario green bonds could be a gamechanger

The Premier of Ontario recently announced that Ontario plans to create green bonds to finance “environmentally friendly infrastructure projects” across Ontario. GallonDaily suggests that these bonds could be a gamechanger in the financial services sector but only if the Province designs the program properly.

Why a gamechanger?

Ontario residents, like those of most other Canadian provinces and US states, have shown that they are eager to participate in environmental initiatives where they can provide helpful input with little or no disruption to their lives which they often already perceive as hectic. The high participation rate in Ontario Blue Box recycling is just one of many examples. Moving some of one’s savings to green bonds is even easier than recycling through the Blue Box. If the program is designed correctly, then it is likely that millions of Ontario residents, and potentially some from other provinces as well, will move some of their savings and investments to the new green bonds, potentially causing the size of the green bond fund to greatly exceed government projections, whatever they are. If this happens, movement of investment from conventional savings and investments to green bonds is likely to cause banks and other financial service companies to introduce green investment vehicles of their own. This could be a real boost to the greening of all kinds of capital projects, not just those that fall under provincial government jurisdiction.

What are the risks?

Unfortunately, government does not always get new initiatives designed and implemented properly. We have no way of knowing at this stage whether the government will design the green bond program in a way that makes it attractive to individual investors. The initial announcement of the project is already confused. In the first paragraph, and in quotes in the press release from the Premier and the Minister of Finance, the green bonds are announced as being for transit, something that is not likely to attract a ton of public interest outside of Toronto. Even in Toronto transit is a highly controversial topic with proponents of the different modes (subway, light rail bus, etc.) battling it out at every opportunity.

The premier says that the province plans to issue green bonds next year, subject to the passage of legislation and the receipt of certification. That is a pretty fast, though not impossible, timetable for designing the program. It reminds us of the Ontario government’s Green Energy Act, introduced too fast and with far too little consultation, it remains a highly controversial program to this day. The government, in a minority position in the Legislature, may face an election following a possible defeat of the budget in the Spring. this would presumably delay or kill the green bond program. Environment Minister Jim Bradley, currently the longest serving member of the legislature and a pretty astute politician, told GallonDaily recently that he is sure that the Ontario election will not come until 2015, but even Jim Bradley could be wrong.

How should the program be designed?

GallonDaily sees the following as being among the elements that are essential for a successful Ontario green bond program:

  • a competitive rate of return. If the bonds provide a lower rate of return than other government investments, people will decide to keep their savings in higher rate instruments.
  • a government guarantee at least as good as provided to other government savings bonds. Maybe even slightly better than, given that green bonds are an investment vehicle new to Canada.
  • a clear plan showing how the promised rate of return will be achieved throughout the life of the bonds.
  • clearly green. There are ways in which even public transit projects can be designed so as not to be green. Low potential ridership is one of these. The funds from the green bonds must be used only for projects which the vast majority of the population sees as being green.
  • absence of controversy regarding the green status of the bonds. Using green bond capital for such projects as nuclear power plants or energy from waste plants would introduce a level of controversy that would scare away many investors. There is no evidence that this will happen, but, where politicians are involved, one never knows. Even if just one of the opposition parties were to say that if it came to power it would use green bond funds for a controversial project such as one of these, that alone may be enough to scare off lots of individual investors.
  • the right balance between management expenses and investment in projects. In recent years there has been much controversy in Ontario about the salaries paid to executives in publicly funded organizations. Couple that with public outrage regarding salaries paid to bank executives and the potential for big disaster looms.
  • absolute transparency. Everything the green bond board does, from salaries to expenses to assessment of investment opportunities and investments, must be included in information made available to the public. In GallonDaily’s 25 years of experience, green consumers are much more critical observers of the organizations that they deal with than mainstream members of the public. These people will put Ontario green bonds under a very high power magnifying glass.
  • good marketing. Most people do not know much about green bonds. A program of education will be essential. Governments used to excel at leading the public but today excellence in leadership seems too often to be lacking. If the bond funds are to be used for such essential projects as renewal of crumbling underground infrastructure (water and sewer mains, for example) then good public education and marketing will be essential because many residents know very little, if anything, about these serious environmental problems and may not see them as environmental priorities.
  • independence from political interference. In GallonDaily’s opinion, the green bond program and decisions about fund investments should be made by an arm’s length board of qualified experts, not by the provincial Cabinet. In today’s society it is difficult to know who is most trusted but politicians do not often come close to the top of the list. A board of experts from various sectors, environment, economic development, and finance, among others, will likely have greater credibility than a board made up of politicians from the governing party.

GallonDaily invites your comments on this article, possibly including your thoughts on what it would take to encourage you to invest in Ontario green bonds. Please send them by responding through the leave a comment button below or by email to editor@gallonletter.ca . We will publish a selection of those received in Gallon Environment Letter.

The Ontario Premier’s brief announcement about the forthcoming green bond program is available at http://news.ontario.ca/opo/en/2013/10/province-proposes-new-way-to-fund-infrastructure.html

 

 

Alberta newspaper blasts federal government over its environmental attitude

The extent to which newspaper editorials reflect community opinion is debatable, as is the extent to which Canada’s current federal government is a reflection of Alberta public opinion, but both of these factors help to attract GallonDaily’s attention to an editorial in a small town Alberta newspaper.

Bonnyville is a town of about 6,500 roughly 250km northeast of Edmonton, not quite in the heart of oil country but on the way to the oil sands if one is driving from the west. The local area includes several large petroleum processing plants. In the 2011 federal election the Conservative party candidate, Brian Storseth, received 77.8% of the vote, up from 72.7% in 2008.

The Bonnyville Nouvelle is a community newspaper serving communities throughout this region with a combined population of about 30,000. In its latest edition the Nouvelle contains, under the headline The right to a healthy environment, an editorial which can only be described as hostile to the federal government’s attitude towards environmentalists. In the article the newspaper makes the following comments, among others:

  • We are seeing environmental movements painted as radical and a threat to national security
  • Politicians have demonized environmental groups and those affiliated with them, using name-calling and intimidation in order to discredit groups and discourage others from further activism.
  • Could it be argued that industry and government are hijacking our regulatory and democratic systems?’
  • Shouldn’t the passion for the environment Canadians are showing be applauded?
  • The government and industry appear antagonistic towards finding better and more sustainable solutions to our energy needs.
  • How is it our government and its security services have managed to make it wrong to stand up for the environment and bully and intimidate those that do, yet regulations, enforcement and even an understanding of the ongoing destruction of the environment goes un-punished, or worse yet, unnoticed?

It is possible that the newspaper was simply trying to be provocative but GallonDaily’s reading of the entire piece suggest that is not the case. It reads as a heartfelt piece.

If this editorial is indicative of at least some part of majority public opinion in Alberta it is quite likely that the Federal Government will scramble over the next two years, before the next election, to shore up its environmental reputation. Policy scrambles are rarely good for business: they lead to ill-conceived and economically inefficient policies and most likely include unnecessary spending (politicians still think that problems are most quickly solved by throwing money at them) and poor quality environmental results.

The complete editorial can be found at http://www.bonnyvillenouvelle.ca/article/20131203/BNV0902/312039983/-1/bnv/the-right-to-a-healthy-environment

GallonDaily will be watching for the response.

UK Deputy Prime Minister speaks on environment and economy

Last month the UK Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg spoke at length to a green-themed conference regarding both the government’s and his party’s approach to the environment. Nick Clegg is leader of the Liberal Democrats, since 2010 in coalition with the Conservatives to form the UK government. Among the many points made by Clegg:

  • Over the years, I’ve heard the green agenda described in a number of ways: vote winner, vote loser; niche interest; minority sport; middle class luxury; Lib Dem obsession, even.
  • And yet these days, across much of the Westminster village at least, the environment is being written off by campaign chiefs on both left and right: too expensive in hard times; a distraction from more pressing debates.
  • Conventional wisdom tells us that the environment must now go on the backburner while we prioritise our economic recovery – but I believe the opposite is true. If there was ever a time to sharpen our focus on our green commitments, it’s now. There is a perfect symmetry between the nature of our economic recovery and our environmental responsibilities.
  • This idea that the British people have suddenly stopped caring about green issues simply isn’t true.
  • A few weeks ago, I announced a 5p charge on throw-away plastic bags. I cannot tell you how many people advised me against it. I was warned that this was the wrong time. It would be presented in the media as a tax on hardworking people. I would look out of touch. Yet every single person I have spoken to about it since has told me they support the move. Even the few who have grumbled to me that they would have preferred government to foot the cost have still agreed: if it reduces the carrier bags blighting our countryside and harming our wildlife – which it will – it’s a small price to pay.
  • My commitment to the green agenda is as strong as it ever was, and it will stay that way – whether fashionable or not.
  • [Energy and Climate Change Minister] Ed Davey’s Energy Bill is going to create the world’s first low carbon electricity market. Over the last year alone, the amount of renewable electricity generated in the UK has grown dramatically. On our watch, the UK has increased its lead as the world’s number one generator of offshore wind. Britain is on track to meet our target of getting 15% of our energy from renewables by 2020.
  • [Business, Innovation and Skills Secretary] Vince Cable’s Green Investment Bank – another world first – is up and running. Its first few projects alone will support a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to taking over 1 million cars off our roads.
  • 80% of the 85,000 homes which have had a Green Deal [energy efficiency] assessment have told us that they have or intend to install an energy saving measure as a result.
  • We’ve introduced the Local Sustainable Transport Fund – a pot of money for councils to invest specifically in low carbon transport schemes.
  • Over £1 billion is now being invested to make it easier for people to get about on foot and by bike, buses, trains and trams.
  • As we head to the annual UN climate change negotiations in Warsaw, we do so as a leading voice within the EU, where we are pushing, crucially, for agreement to cut the EU’s greenhouse gases by 50% by 2030. This is the most ambitious target proposed by any member state.
  • In our natural environment, we’ve introduced a presumption in favour of sustainable development, and maintained strong protections for the Green Belt and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
  • We’re on track to plant a million more trees by the end of the parliament – the majority in the most deprived and least green areas.
  • After a comprehensive review, we plan to launch a new National Pollinator strategy next spring to protect the country’s bees and many other pollinating insects.
  • We’re reducing the amount of waste we send to landfill and we’re investing in cleaning up England’s rivers, lakes and waterways.
  • We’ve promoted animal welfare, including ending the practice of keeping laying hens in tiny battery cages and, for the first time, implementing welfare standards for game-birds.
  • We’re seeing encouraging progress on biodiversity – this year’s biodiversity assessment report shows, for example, more land and sea protected and fish stocks better managed.
  • We have also now implemented the Marine and Coastal Access Act, which seeks to improve the management and protection of our marine environment and increase public access to our coastal paths: so more people can access the beauty of Britain’s landscape, and we’re going to be saying more about marine conservation shortly.
  • Protecting the green agenda will, in my view, require leadership on 3 specific fronts:
    • First, we need to aggressively counter the myth that if you are for the environment you must be against the consumer. we need to be much more robust – all of us – in rejecting utterly the idea that being pro-green is somehow anti-consumer. That is a false choice and it warps the public discussion around these issues.
    • Second, we must ensure that, as we continue with our recovery, we make low carbon industry a cornerstone of the new economy.
    • Third, we need a renewed focus on our natural environment. Our efforts to drive UK prosperity will be meaningless if we don’t protect our natural wealth.
  • And we are all better off when British green businesses flourish. We must never, ever talk about consumers as if they are somehow divorced from the wider economy. The UK’s green industry is worth around £128 billion and employs almost a million people. We’re relieved when we hear that the economy is expected to grow this year by 1.4%. Well between 2011 and 2012, the low carbon and renewable sector grew by around 3% and it’s expected to keep on growing. China, India, America, Germany, Brazil – the race is on with our competitors for green global investment. China has committed to invest $286bn in renewables – that’s bigger than the Finnish economy. On energy efficiency, they’re investing $376bn in energy efficiency – that’s bigger than the economy of the United Arab Emirates.
  • If Britain wants to keep up, our green industries need maximum political support.

The entire speech can be found at https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/staying-the-course-on-the-environment-nick-clegg-speech

New UNDP report highlights opportunities for public-private partnerships for water management in the Arab region

A new report from the United Nations Development Programme highlights opportunities for managing scarcity and securing the future for water resources in the Middle East and North Africa. The report identifies generic opportunities for improved management of water resources and governance, public-private partnerships, and institutional reform.

The report provides a more in-depth diagnosis and more considered recommendations than many previous commentators. The former includes:

  • Twelve Arab countries have average per capita water availability rates below the World Health Organization threshold for severe scarcity.
  • Threats include natural variability, pollution, overexploitation and climate change.
  • Most shared resources also lack comprehensive international agreements, threatening both water supply and political stability.
  • The water crisis is a crisis of governance.
  • Water security is inseparable from social, economic, environmental and health considerations.
  • Many factors impede progress in water governance, including unclear and overlapping responsibilities, inefficient institutions, insufficient funding, centralized decision-making, limited public awareness and ineffective regulations and enforcement.
  • With more than 5 per cent of the global population and about 10 per cent of the world’s area, the region receives only 2.1 per cent of the world’s average annual precipitation and contains 1.2 per cent of annual renewable water resources. Renewable groundwater quantities are limited, and non-renewable groundwater supplies are threatened by unsustainable use patterns.
  • Balancing multiple water uses amid water scarcity and competing interests can generate social and economic strains. Although agriculture contributes only 7 per cent of GDP, it consumes more water than industrial and municipal users. But reallocating water to more productive sectors such as heavy industry and tourism would make Arab countries even more dependent on food imports and leave millions of unskilled labourers jobless.
  • Competition over transboundary waters such as the Jordan River, shared by Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, the State of Palestine and Syria and the Jubba and Shabele rivers, shared by Ethiopia and Somalia, are at the heart of regional political conflicts. Inadequate governance of shared water resources continues to threaten the region’s stability and impose uncertainty on water resource planning in the downstream countries. Deprivation of water resources in occupied territories is another major issue requiring political movement.
  • The water sector, predominantly publicly owned, has a large funding gap. While most Gulf oil-producing countries can afford the needed investments in water-source solutions such as desalination, many other Arab countries cannot. The Islamic Development Bank estimates that Arab countries may need to invest up to $200 billion in water-related infrastructure over the next 10 years to satisfy growing demand.
  • Some Arab countries have taken steps to reform water governance, but impediments remain, including unclear responsibilities, lack of coordination, inefficient institutions, limited public awareness, highly centralized decision making and ineffective regulations and enforcement.
  • The supply-driven approach to water management in the water-stressed Arab countries has failed to deliver water security. Acquiring water supplies while neglecting use and allocation efficiency has led to unsustainable water practices.

The very extensive recommendations include such proposals as:

  • Mechanisms should be established to allow effective and meaningful participation of all relevant stakeholders (such as water user associations) in formulating, implementing and monitoring water governance policies and strategies.
  • Several approaches can be introduced, such as decentralization and the transfer of responsibility and authority to local user groups, and legal frameworks can be formulated to expand public-private partnership capacity. Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Tunisia offer successful examples of public-private partnerships.
  • A major shift in water policies is required, emphasizing conservation and demand management to secure long-term water supplies while meeting strict criteria for socio-economic, financial and environmental sustainability and public health requirements.
  • Linking water economy and policies with other economic sectors.
  • Arranging for cooperative management and governance of shared and transboundary water resources between all riparian countries.
  • Establishing monitoring, feedback and assessment mechanisms for water policies and decision-making at all levels (forming and implementing). These mechanisms should involve the various stakeholders, researchers and media. This includes making water related data and updated statistics available, developing performance indicators and monitoring them, and integrating incentives in performance and efficiency indicators.
  • Each country should adapt indicators and data to its own priorities, but a regional monitoring system could contribute to better understanding common problems and promoting cooperative solutions.
  • Legislative enforcement in the water sector should be conducted through the judicial system and, more important, through building public support and stakeholder involvement; publicizing success stories and developing better economic incentives such as fees and subsidies; and education, information dissemination and technical assistance. This also includes developing competent inspection capacities, credible monitoring, accredited and standardized measuring systems and certified reporting systems.
  • Raising public awareness through education, training programmes, interactive initiatives and media, among other means. Major themes can include sustainability, use efficiency and participation and common responsibility. Long-term awareness programmes should be tailored to specific local contexts. • Building partnerships with beneficiaries and the private sector, thus encouraging participation in modern, timely and well-monitored and metered water delivery services.
  • Expanding water services to vulnerable communities and encouraging local initiatives in building and managing such services.
  • Increasing irrigation efficiency from its current average levels of about 50 per cent to 70–80 per cent to increase irrigated areas by about 50 per cent and significantly reduce the Arab region’s water deficit and food imports.
  • Increasing Arab cooperation in areas of water, food and energy trade. Establishing a common Arab market could be one step in this direction.
  • Reforming the energy sector, raising awareness of water’s importance in energy-related decisions and establishing coordination and cooperation schemes between the energy and water sectors.
  • Establishing energy-water balance in desalination. • Researching and developing efficient, reliable and scalable renewable energies, desalination and water treatment technologies that better meet the region’s demands.
  • Studying climate change and investigating possible measures to limit its effects or adapt to them.
  • Setting legal instruments to identify and regulate water rights, regulate water allocation among and within sectors and regulate permit systems for drilling wells.
  • Investing in transfer and localization of water-related technologies and knowledge. This includes researching and testing nonconventional water resources (desalination, treated wastewater, rainwater harvesting, cloud seeding and irrigation drainage water), especially at low scales and for domestic uses.

There is a lot in this report for Canadian companies that have technologies, services, and experience relevant to the water needs of Arab countries. The full 168 page report is available at http://www.undp.org/content/dam/rbas/doc/Energy%20and%20Environment/Arab_Water_Gov_Report/Arab_Water_Gov_Report_Full_Final_Nov_27.pdf